Unit 2 · Lesson 6 of 20
Choose evidence for the decision
Match each research question to a method and its limits.
01 / Learn
Learn the method
Fictional case
Several patients ask reception whether the kiosk recorded their arrival. The team wants to decide what to improve first.
Terms for this lesson
- Research question
- A focused uncertainty whose answer could guide a decision.
- Method
- A way to collect or examine evidence.
- Triangulation
- Using different evidence sources to examine the same question.
Start with a decision the team faces. Here the decision is whether to change the kiosk message, the staff queue, or both. Turn that decision into questions: when does the appointment service accept an arrival, when does reception see it, and what do patients understand from the message? Each question points toward a different source of evidence.
System logs can establish request and receipt timing. Queue records can show when a receipt becomes visible to staff. Observation can show how a patient uses the kiosk and seeks help. Interviews can reveal the patient's expectation and the meaning they gave to the message. Support notes can expose recurring situations that deserve closer study.
Every source has a useful boundary. A log records system events; the patient's interpretation comes from observing and speaking with the patient. A small observation study reveals behaviors and possible causes; broader service data helps estimate frequency. Combining sources helps the team check whether one explanation fits the whole task.
Write a compact evidence plan with the question, source, expected signal, and limit for each row. Collect the evidence that would change the decision. This focus keeps research connected to a practical improvement.
Use the method
- State the design decision and the uncertainty behind it.
- Pair each question with a source that can reveal a useful signal.
- Record the limit of each source and the decision it could change.
Evidence becomes useful when its source and its limits match a specific decision question.
- GOV.UK Service Manual: Capturing research questions ↗Start method selection with an uncertainty the team can act on.
- Nielsen Norman Group: Triangulation: Get Better Research Results by Using Multiple UX Methods ↗Use different evidence types to test an explanation's limits.
- GOV.UK Service Manual: User research in discovery ↗Explore current behavior and the full service before proposing a solution.
02 / See the reasoning
Worked example
The team sees a rise in reception questions after kiosk check-in. A researcher pairs three checks: appointment logs for receipt timing, queue records for staff visibility, and short task observations for patient interpretation. The logs show receipts within three seconds and queue updates up to 90 seconds later. Observation then reveals whether the Done message leads patients to expect an immediate staff display.
Try a decision →03 / Decide
Guided decision
The team needs to decide whether the first change belongs in kiosk status copy or the staff queue. Which evidence plan gives them the clearest comparison?
Feedback on your choice
What could change the answer: A queue that updates immediately would focus the next study on the message, environment, and patient's understanding of completion.
Use this feedback to examine your choice and written reasoning.
Build your case file →04 / Build the case
Your case file
Fictional case update
The clinic also records patients who begin check-in and later complete it with reception staff.
Evidence and constraints
- Fictional log detail: appointment-service receipts usually arrive within three seconds.
- Fictional operations detail: the staff queue can refresh up to 90 seconds later.
- Fictional service data: reception tracks requests for check-in help by day, with a free-text note for each request.
Choose one question about this channel switch and pair it with two evidence sources. State what each source can establish and what you would examine next.
Create: A question-to-evidence matrix with source, expected signal, limitation, and decision consequence.
The plan connects a practical decision to multiple complementary sources and states the limits of each.
- The decision appears before the method choices.
- Each source answers a named question.
- The plan distinguishes system timing from patient interpretation.
The chosen sources may support several explanations. The next lesson compares them.
Lesson complete
You added to your case file.
You studied the method, practiced a decision, and added an artifact to your case file. Carry that reasoning into the next lesson.
05 / Keep working