ux-research 3 linked patterns checked

People + AI Guidebook

Practical guidance for human-centered AI products, including user trust, expectations, explanation, feedback, and uncertainty-aware AI product decisions.

Read with a purpose

What this source can teach

Use this source to examine the study question, participants, observations, and limits before applying a finding.

  1. Start with the original. Open the source and find the guidance or example relevant to your task.
  2. Trace the connection. Use the claim notes below to see how this site applies the source to specific patterns.
  3. Check the setting. Compare the source's platform, people, and constraints with your own decision.

Pattern Decisions This Source Supports

Pattern Supported decision Required contract Claim note
Confidence / uncertainty display Choose confidence / uncertainty display when users need to judge prediction reliability before acting on AI or automation output. The display names the task, prediction, source of the confidence estimate, calibration scope, and last calibration or update time when available. Supports human-centered AI design guidance around expectations, explanation, feedback, and trust.
Correction feedback Choose correction feedback when users need to correct AI output, source use, assumptions, recommendations, safety behavior, or answer quality after an AI response is shown. A correction feedback action preserves answer ID, response version, claim span, source ID, user reason, expected correction, submitter, timestamp, and chosen scope. Supports human-centered AI feedback, expectations, explanation, and trust decisions.
Scope clarification Choose scope clarification when the AI needs a missing boundary before producing a reliable answer, plan, retrieval query, or tool action. The system identifies what boundary is missing before asking the user to clarify. Supports expectation setting, trust, explanation, and uncertainty-aware AI decisions.

Comparisons supported by this source

Evidence Role

This source is treated as ux-research evidence. Its value comes from the specific claims and setting described above.

Publisher: Google PAIR. Last checked: .

Saved items