ux-research 2 linked patterns checked

People + AI Guidebook: Explainability and Trust

Documents trust calibration, probability and uncertainty, partial explanations, system explanations, output explanations, confidence displays, and when users should apply judgment.

Read with a purpose

What this source can teach

Use this source to examine the study question, participants, observations, and limits before applying a finding.

  1. Start with the original. Open the source and find the guidance or example relevant to your task.
  2. Trace the connection. Use the claim notes below to see how this site applies the source to specific patterns.
  3. Check the setting. Compare the source's platform, people, and constraints with your own decision.

Pattern Decisions This Source Supports

Pattern Supported decision Required contract Claim note
AI confidence shown as fake precision Flag this anti-pattern when an AI or automated surface shows a precise score without calibration scope, decision threshold, freshness, uncertainty reason, or safe next action. The interface distinguishes raw internal scores from user-facing calibrated confidence. Supports trust calibration, probability and uncertainty, confidence displays, and user judgment around AI output.
AI limitation onboarding Choose AI limitation onboarding when the user needs first-use or changed-capability orientation about AI benefits, limits, data scope, uncertainty, feedback, human responsibility, and fallback. The onboarding explains what the AI can help with and what it is not able to do before the first risky use. Supports trust calibration, uncertainty, explanations, and when users should apply judgment.

Comparisons supported by this source

Evidence Role

This source is treated as ux-research evidence. Its value comes from the specific claims and setting described above.

Publisher: Google PAIR. Last checked: .

Saved items