Clinic case file · Practice professionally
Explain a design decision clearly
Use the supplied case evidence to make one artifact. Review it against the criteria and identify the evidence that could change your decision.
01 / Case evidence
The situation
Fictional scenario
Four weeks after launch, reception logs show fewer status questions during the morning and a similar number during evening sessions.
Evidence and constraints
- Fictional current evidence: Mira asks reception after reading Done; receipt and queue timestamps show a delay.
- Fictional prototype evidence: two of six patients treated a delayed state as completed check-in before the revision.
- Fictional release plan: kiosk copy changes now; queue integration follows later.
- Fictional follow-up: morning status questions fall after launch; evening questions remain similar.
Add this result to the decision record as a follow-up. State one evening-session question and the next owner action.
Produce: A one-page decision record with linked evidence, alternatives, recommendation, owners, and review trigger.
02 / Make and review
Your artifact
Your writing is stored only in this browser if you save it. Copy it to keep a separate version.
03 / Self-review
Check your judgment
Specific standard: A colleague can follow the chain from patient evidence to choice and see the condition for revisiting it.
- The problem and evidence appear before the recommendation.
- Alternatives receive a fair account.
- An owner and observable review trigger close the record.
Next step
Use your review to guide a revision. Compare your artifact with the specific standard above, inspect the worked example and guided feedback, then test your assumptions in the actual setting.
Use the evidence you named in your revision note to decide whether to keep, change, or discard your approach.