Independent case · Practice professionally
Communicate a defensible decision
Apply the method in a new context. Review your own artifact against the criteria and decide what evidence would change it.
01 / New context
The situation
Fictional scenario
A mobile banking team considers showing transaction details before a recurring transfer is scheduled.
Write a decision memo comparing at least two flows. State the evidence you have, what you still need, consequences of error, and the signal that would prompt revision.
Produce: A decision memo of at most one page with recommendation, alternatives, uncertainty, owner, and review trigger.
02 / Make and review
Your artifact
Your writing is stored only in this browser if you save it. Copy it to keep a separate version.
03 / Self-review
Check your judgment
Specific standard: The memo ties its recommendation to evidence and consequence, treats alternatives fairly, and makes uncertainty and decision ownership explicit.
Next step
Your review is a prompt for revision, not an automatic grade. Compare your artifact with the specific standard above, inspect the worked example and guided feedback, then test your assumptions in the actual setting.
Use the evidence you named in your revision note to decide whether to keep, change, or discard your approach.