ux-research 2 linked patterns checked

GOV.UK Accessibility in government: conditionally revealed questions

Documents GOV.UK radio and checkbox components offering conditional reveal fields, common use for related follow-up questions, and accessibility risk where screen reader users may not be notified when new follow-up content appears.

Read with a purpose

What this source can teach

Use this source to examine the study question, participants, observations, and limits before applying a finding.

  1. Start with the original. Open the source and find the guidance or example relevant to your task.
  2. Trace the connection. Use the claim notes below to see how this site applies the source to specific patterns.
  3. Check the setting. Compare the source's platform, people, and constraints with your own decision.

Pattern Decisions This Source Supports

Pattern Supported decision Required contract Claim note
Conditional reveal fields Choose conditional reveal fields when one option needs a short, directly related follow-up field in the same local context. Selecting the trigger shows the related field immediately under that trigger. GOV.UK accessibility research supports the related-follow-up use case and the need to consider whether newly revealed questions are announced.
Required field hidden by conditional logic Flag this anti-pattern when a required field can block submit while it is hidden, collapsed, disabled, off-screen, absent from the current route, or disconnected from its trigger. Selecting a trigger that creates a required follow-up reveals that follow-up immediately in logical DOM and visual order. GOV.UK accessibility research supports the risk that newly revealed conditional questions may be missed by assistive technology users.

Comparisons supported by this source

Evidence Role

This source is treated as ux-research evidence. Its value comes from the specific claims and setting described above.

Publisher: Government Digital Service. Last checked: .

Saved items