platform-guideline checked
EDPB Cookie Banner Taskforce report
Summarizes supervisory-authority positions on cookie banner practices including missing reject options, pre-ticked boxes, deceptive link design, misleading button contrast, essential-cookie classification, and accessible consent withdrawal.
Pattern Decisions This Source Supports
| Pattern | Supported decision | Required contract | Claim note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cookie banner | Choose cookie banner when a user must be told about cookies or similar technologies and must be able to accept or reject non-essential storage before it is set. | The banner appears before non-essential storage is set and remains until the user accepts, rejects, or saves preferences. | EDPB taskforce guidance covers missing reject options, pre-ticked boxes, deceptive link design, misleading contrast, essential-cookie classification, and withdrawal access. |
| Cookie consent | Choose cookie consent when the decision controls cookies, pixels, local storage, tags, SDKs, or similar storage and access on the user's device. | Optional cookies, pixels, local storage, analytics tags, advertising tags, and similar technologies remain blocked until the matching purpose is accepted. | Supports reject-option, pre-ticked-box, deceptive-link, contrast, essential-cookie, and withdrawal rules for cookie consent interfaces. |
| Dark-pattern consent | Flag this anti-pattern when accepting optional consent is one click but declining, customizing, or withdrawing requires extra pages, hidden links, confusing labels, or repeated confirmation. | Acceptance, rejection, customization, and withdrawal must be reachable with comparable effort for optional purposes. | Supports reject-option, pre-ticked-box, deceptive-link, contrast, and withdrawal concerns in cookie consent interfaces. |
Evidence Role
This source is treated as platform-guideline evidence. Use it to validate the decision rules above, not as a visual style reference.
Publisher: European Data Protection Board. Last checked: .